Federal Law Minister Forough Naseem while addressing the National Assembly session said that I want to present some facts related to Clubbhushan Yadav Ordinance in the House, I want to explain why it was necessary to bring Clubbhushan Yadav Ordinance, no punishment of spy was pardoned. If the ordinance had not been brought, India would have benefited from international law. With this ordinance, we cut off the hands of India. The opposition should not politicize this sensitive security issue.
Forough Naseem said that Kulbhushan Yadav was arrested on March 3, 2016. The then federal government may have decided not to grant consular access. However, on May 8, 2017, India took the Kulbhushan case to the International Court of Justice. Decided to give consular access to Yadav.
The Federal Law Minister said that the International Court of Justice rejected the Indian request for the release of Kulbhushan Yadav, the ordinance was issued in view of the decision of the International Court of Justice, this ordinance is not NRO, NRO issued by Pervez Musharraf. What if, if Pakistan does not give consular access then India will make a fuss in the world.
Forough Naseem said that the ordinance was brought in the light of the decision of the International Court of Justice. India wants us not to accept the decision of the ICJ. India wants the Security Council to go and pass a resolution against us. Respectfully, Indian spy Kulbhushan Yadav did not commute any sentence, the ordinance did not commute the sentence of the convict nor did it provide any facility, if the sentence of Kulbhushan had been commuted, I would have protested with the opposition. ۔
The Federal Minister said that the ICJ had not abolished the sentence of Clubbhushan and neither would the ordinance, so the ICJ said that Clubbhushan should be given consular access.
