Rhea's interview as 'unsuccessful attempt', reveals many secrets in the blog

Vishal Kirti (husband of Shweta Singh Kirti), brother-in-law of late actor Sushant Singh Rajput, has attacked actress Riya Chakraborty, saying that her recent interview was an unsuccessful attempt to change the story of the case. Vishal has written a long blog post defending the family of the late actor. 

In this, he has said many important things without mentioning Riya's name. Riya who is the main suspect in this case and is under investigation by three central agencies investigating the case - ED, CBI and NCB.

Vishal wrote how 'mental health is being used by the accused to conceal his crime'. He wrote, 'According to one channel, a source in the CBI has made a big disclosure that Sushant was looking at properties in Himachal, Kerala and Coorg on search engines before his death. While the Mumbai Police misguided the entire country through a lie that it was earlier searching for things like 'painless death' on search engines. ' They feel that Mumbai Police is 'hiding things on a large scale' by doing so. He wrote, 'I am a champion of the Ment Health Initiative and have read many books on various aspects of mental health, including DSM-5. But in this case, mental health is being used by the accused to conceal the crime. Whether the case is of murder or suicide, why was the Mumbai Police misleading the public? If it was a suicide, it was done by criminal forces to create a reason behind it and if it is a murder, then it is clear in itself.

Vishal further said, 'I saw in interviews that the accused said that he was going into depression and then he called the psychiatrist. His mental state was such that he needed drugs. If we assume that Sushant had become dangerous due to depression, the accused was threatened by him, would the accused give him drugs. Some Chamcha channels tried to establish that Sushant was not taking the right medicines prescribed for depression which led to his suicide. Whereas according to him, the reality is that Sushant's situation had become much better in the middle of May, because the criminals had stopped giving him drugs.

He wrote, 'Everything was difficult till the middle of May when the accused started blackmailing. It seems that when the accused came out of Sushant's house on June 8, she took Sushant's laptop, his old cellphone and other devices with him. What other than those reports of her mental health were those devices she was blackmailing Sushant about? The accused tried to change the PIN of Sushant's debit card at the same time when he was recovering and wanted to remove the accused from her house.

To control Sushant, Vishal wrote, 'Imprisonment and control are the strengths of a sociopath. The accused said in the interview that my three years went to Waterstone Resorts and came back the same day. It seems that the reason behind this was the problems in their family relations. Vishal wrote on this, 'While the real story is that Sushant wanted to come to Chandigarh with his sister and took a ticket, but due to blackmailing of the conspirator, he had to kneel and he canceled his ticket. This clearly shows the control being exercised over it. I am happy that all my three years did not stop with the accused, otherwise what is known, what other new charges she would have made. In January 2020, similarly, the accused forced Sushant to return via phone.

Vishal said that the accused said that Sushant did not have a good relationship with his father, as his father left him at an early age. He wrote, 'The real thing is that my father-in-law came to Delhi only when Sushant was in high school and Priyanka Di was in college. For me, this is a father's dedication to the education of his children. At the same time my wife was studying in Patna's best school and my late mother-in-law was with her in Patna so that my wife could complete her schooling. Such stories are being made for the parents who were with them all the time to support their children that the father left his son? '

On the alleged use of the drug, Vishal said, 'After all the drug chat leaks, the defense of the accused is that Sushant used to take drugs (and the accused and his accomplices used to arrange it just for him. Which has been revealed in the chat). This is a ridiculous thing Even if we accept it for a moment, what kind of partner was it that was arranging drugs for her loved one that she never wanted to take on her own and neither did she take (as she did in the interview said). This means that one of the two things is true, either the accused was forcibly giving drugs to Sushant or it was the accused who was taking drugs.

Vishal finally talked about his sister-in-law Mitu Didi. He wrote, 'I saw that when the matter came between 8 to 14 June, the accused tried to put the ball in the court of Mitu Di. This is one of his tricks. Thankfully, when there was no one there, Mitu Di was there because living with the accused or his puppets became less of a threat. come